IOA vp Sudhanshu Mittal alleged that ‘a serious cowl up’ was finished to permit Narinder Batra to contest election for Indian Olympic Association.
- Last Updated: June 8, 2020, 11:10 PM IST
Two-and-a-half years after Narinder Batra’s election as Indian Olympic Association chief, considered one of its vice presidents has questioned his taking over the highest job, saying he was not even eligible to contest the polls beneath the then structure.
IOA vp Sudhanshu Mittal, in a letter to the International hockey federation FIH, alleged that “a major cover up” was finished to permit Narendra Batra contest election for the highest sports activities job of the nation.
Mittal mentioned Batra’s eligibility was “falsified” twice and one even impacted his place as FIH president in 2017.
Mittal’s allegations on the “illegality” of Batra’s election have come amid the feud among the many prime brass of the IOA. He had earlier written to the International Olympic Committee, claiming that Batra was “illegally” elected as IOA president.
Batra on Monday had mentioned that he’ll reply to Mittal’s allegations as soon as he joins workplace after his residence quarantine.
Mittal’s predominant allegation is that the IOA structure of 2013, as accepted by the IOC, supplied that the presidential candidate may have to be a member of the previous govt council and Batra was not a member of that.
He alleged that structure’s interpretation was modified to membership of two previous govt councils as a substitute of solely the final council in a Special General Body Meeting held on November 29, 2017.
It occurred two days after the nomination of candidates was launched to permit Batra contest the elections. Batra was elected IOA chief on December 14, 2017.
“It is very clear…that this decision to change the interpretation of the constitution of the IOA (in the SGM of Nov 29, 2017) to include any two preceding (2012 and 2014) Executive Council instead of preceding (2014) Executive Council was taken by the General Assembly after three people filed nomination for the post of president,” Mittal mentioned within the letter.
“To be more specific, Batra was not eligible to contest for the post of president on the date of his filing of nomination, on or prior to 27/11/2017.”
He additionally mentioned that the minutes of the SGM which talked about a change in interpretation of the structure was solely accepted on December 14, 2017.
“If the election had to be duly held in accordance with the changed interpretation of the constitution, the election notice should have been issued after 14/12/2017,” he wrote.
His one other allegation is that Batra was nominated by Hockey India to the electoral school of the IOA for the 2017 polls even if he was now not related to it since he had already resigned as its president following his election as FIH chief.
Under IOA structure, the particular person nominated by every member models have to be the members of the manager our bodies of those models.
“…Batra was either president of FIH in his personal capacity and did not represent Hockey India or he represented Hockey India as an Executive Board member to the electoral college of the IOA,” Mittal wrote within the letter.
“The president of international hockey federation who is responsible for integrity compromised it for self interest.”
Under FIH structure, all members of the Executive Board (aside from presidents of continental federations) maintain workplace of their private capability and never as representatives of any member or every other organisation.